All New Testament Editions Are Eclectic: A Misleading Equivalence
Distinguishes correcting an inherited textual base from reconstructing a text from an aggregate and explains why calling every edition eclectic obscures that difference.
Open record →21 published records in this controlled archive.
Distinguishes correcting an inherited textual base from reconstructing a text from an aggregate and explains why calling every edition eclectic obscures that difference.
Open record →Tests whether appeals to secret providential preservation can exempt isolated or newly recovered readings from the evidential weight of public continuity.
Open record →Examines how a chain of revisable probabilities can make the critic’s judgment function as the final court at every disputed textual locus.
Open record →Analyzes the methodological consequence of admitting that textual criticism has no explicit biblical guidelines for ordering its probabilistic canons.
Open record →Traces the shift from John Owen’s doctrine of a presently possessed authentic text to B. B. Warfield’s account of autographic inerrancy and critical restoration.
Open record →Surveys Reformed orthodox teaching on the present authenticity and purity of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures while acknowledging ordinary transmissional variation.
Open record →