What Scrivener Actually Reconstructed
Scrivener worked backward from the Authorized Version to identify the translators’ earlier Greek choices. He did not translate English into Greek or invent those choices in 1881. The…
Open record →Tag: F. H. A. Scrivener
8 published records in this controlled archive.
Text, Witness, Edition, and Translation
The argument over TBS repeatedly collapses four different things: the inspired text, manuscript witnesses, printed editions, and translations. Keeping them distinct exposes why manuscript counting, historical collation, and…
Open record →“The Only Consistency Is the KJV”: Steele’s Accusation Stated Fairly
Stephen Steele’s case against the Trinitarian Bible Society is more substantial than a single slogan. This opening article states his argument at its strongest, identifies what he has…
Open record →
Testing Keister’s Method: Matthew 1:7–8, 10–19 and the Actual Variance
Compares Scrivener and NA28 across Matthew 1:7–8 and 10–19, testing Keister’s method at the Asa/Asaph and Amon/Amos readings and the passage’s remaining variants.
Open record →
“Which TR?” and “Which Critical Text?”: Applying the Same Standard to Both
Applies the demand for a precisely identified text to both Received Text and critical-text positions, including Keister’s Sturzian approach.
Open record →