Complete textual-variant dossier
Adverse entailment established
Sections distinguish readings, edition history, evidence, theological consequences, and the Research Center's evaluation. CBGM is an analytical tool; editorial committees—not the software—make textual decisions.
1Passage and issue
Passage
Issue
Acts 28:29 narrates the immediate result of Paul’s final word from Isaiah: his Jewish hearers leave while debating vigorously among themselves.
Variant class
Omission / addition
2Textus Receptus
Greek reading
the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves
Authorized Version
“And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.” — Acts 28:29
Edition note
The Research Center uses the received Greek text underlying the Authorized Version as its baseline; edition-specific differences are recorded when the variation unit requires them.
Historical annotation witness
Erasmus’s Annotationes
Erasmus’s printed Greek text, his Latin annotation, and the Research Center’s evaluation are distinct evidence. Each edition remains separately identified because Erasmus revised the Annotationes across his five editions.
Not yet assessed. No inference about Erasmus’s silence has been made. A Latin annotation and translation will appear here only after an edition and exact locus have been verified.
The Erasmus annotation audit has not yet been completed for this locus. Do not infer from this status that Erasmus was silent.
Westminster and Dutch annotation witnesses
Westminster Annotations
Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.
Dutch Annotations
Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.
3NA28 baseline and critical-text rationale
NA28 baseline reading
the verse is absent
Translation or explanation
the verse is absent
Metzger’s report of the UBS committee
Metzger reports the UBS4 committee's treatment of the variation unit. The note grounds the relevant decision in the likelihood of scribal or liturgical expansion; the printed confidence rating represented here is {B}. This is a controlled synopsis rather than a quotation.
Locator: Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed., note on Acts 28:29
ECM / CBGM evidence and editors
No passage-specific ECM/CBGM editorial explanation is attached to this record. Official method sources describe the CBGM as a set of coherence procedures, not a decision-maker: editors define variation units and local stemmata and evaluate pre-genealogical, genealogical, and stemmatic coherence together with transcriptional, intrinsic, and other philological evidence.
4UBS6 and intended NA29 revision
No UBS6 / intended NA29 main-text change is recorded for this passage in the controlled 169-change ledger.
No change row is attached to this passage.
UBS6 is published, and the German Bible Society identifies its Greek main text as identical to the intended NA29 main text. The complete NA29 volume and its apparatus remain forthcoming. Project-ledger rows retain their source and verification statements until they are checked against the published UBS6 text and, when available, the NA29 apparatus.
5Doctrinal and four-point analysis
Effect class
Exegetical or interpretive consequence
Exact proposition affected
No single doctrinal proposition is directly changed; the principal consequence is exegetical, historical, or cumulative.
Doctrinal analysis
The omission at Acts 28:29 must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.
Controlled source-list matches
Doctrinal significance and Westminster use
This passage is listed in one or both controlling research files. Their claims are reported with exact source identity and confessional use; list membership does not by itself establish the original reading or the Research Center’s final entailment.
Doctrinally significant variant listActs 28.29
Doctrinally Significant Variants Itemised
Anonymous compilation — supplied source file pp. 29–30
Doctrine or doctrinal consequence identified by the source
Again, without this verse, an important historical fact is omitted. We would defer to the time-honoured, demonstrably more reliable Byzantine Text.
Source-reported readings and witness argument
Received reading reported
And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves. (Act 28:29 Authorised Version)
Critical reading reported
[omit]
Manuscript and patristic support reported by the source
The omission of this phrase is supported by Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and even E08 and Lavra B 64. That said, Chrysostom directly cites the text in his Homily LV on Acts 28.17-20. The verse also appears in the overwhelming majority of the Byzantine manuscripts, and in the Latin Vulgate.
Editorial qualification: The compilation’s doctrinal inferences and witness claims are reported as its argument, not silently adopted as verified fact. Exact entailment is retained: weakening an explicit statement is not automatically a formal denial of the doctrine.
Bahnsen four-point examination
Arbitrariness
At Acts 28:29, the critical choice avoids arbitrariness only to the extent that it states public manuscript, transcriptional, and intrinsic grounds. Passage: Acts 28:29 Received reading: the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves Principal competing reading: the verse is absent Issue class: Whole-Verse Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.
Inconsistency
The criteria used at Acts 28:29 must be applied to comparable readings as well. A principle such as age, difficulty, brevity, or coherence cannot be decisive here and quietly reversed elsewhere merely to escape a historical, grammatical, or theological difficulty.
Consequences
Exegetical or interpretive consequence: The omission at Acts 28:29 must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.
Preconditions of intelligibility
The argument presupposes stable authorship, meaningful language, objective logical norms, transmissible evidence, and a coherent account of how Scripture can be received and identified by the church. The analysis tests whether the method can make those conditions intelligible without reducing the text to an indefinitely revisable editorial construct.
This framework examines an argument and its conditions; it does not claim to read an editor's private motives.
6Argument for the received reading
External and historical evidence
Sources and further reading The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, Acts 28:29. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version (1894), Acts 28:29.
Internal and transcriptional evidence
Passage: Acts 28:29 Received reading: the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves Principal competing reading: the verse is absent Issue class: Whole-Verse Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. The omission at Acts 28:29 must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.
Reception and ecclesiastical use
The received reading and its ecclesiastical use require passage-specific documentation; the age of a witness and the age of a reading must not be confused.
Providential-preservation analysis
Providential preservation is not used as a substitute for evidence at Acts 28:29. It supplies the confessional context in which manuscript transmission, broad reception, and the church's actual possession of Scripture are evaluated together.
Canonical coherence with the rest of Scripture
Canonical coherence remains an explicit test: a proposed reading must make grammatical and theological sense within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. No conflict is asserted merely because two editions differ; the claimed incoherence must be demonstrated at this passage.
Canonical-coherence verdict
The Authorized Version is retained where its representation of the TR forms a coherent reading within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. Any competing form must demonstrate an equal or better canonical fit rather than merely invoke an edition or method label.
Response to the principal critical argument
Passage: Acts 28:29 Received reading: the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves Principal competing reading: the verse is absent Issue class: Whole-Verse Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.
Passage-specific evidence from consulted works
Core 0.6.3 supplied-source audit complete: 1 passage-specific note attached. Incidental citations and global-method sources are retained in the audit report rather than presented as local textual evidence.
Doctrinally Significant Variants ItemisedAttributed doctrinal and canonical-coherence argument
Anonymous compilation — supplied PDF pp. 29–30
Acts 28.29: It sets “And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves. (Act 28:29 Authorised Version)” against “[omit].” Its stated doctrinal argument is that Again, without this verse, an important historical fact is omitted. We would defer to the time-honoured, demonstrably more reliable Byzantine Text. The compilation appeals to The omission of this phrase is supported by Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and even E08 and Lavra B 64. That said, Chrysostom directly cites the text in his Homily LV on Acts 28.17-20.cxxxvi The verse also appears in the overwhelming majority of the Byzantine manuscripts, and in the Latin Vulgate.
Editorial use: The compilation’s doctrinal inferences and witness claims are reported as its argument, not silently adopted as verified fact. Exact entailment is retained: weakening an explicit statement is not automatically a formal denial of the doctrine.
Conclusion
The immediate sequence gives Acts 28:29 a concrete setting: Acts 28:28 says, “Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.” Acts 28:30 says, “And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all that came in unto him,.”
Keep the received verse as the natural narrative hinge between the divided audience and Luke’s concluding summary.
Logical entailment
The Authorized Version serves as the faithful English representation. The preservation claim applies immediately to the authentic Hebrew and Greek texts—not to an English translation as though it were the inspired source.
Canonical-status rule: Physical printing is not canonical inclusion. If an edition prints a passage in double brackets while judging it secondary or non-original, it disagrees with the received text concerning the identity and extent of inspired Scripture.
Status: Established
Immediate textual or doctrinal consequence
At Acts 28:29, the received text reads “the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves” and its Authorized Version representation reads “And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.” — Acts 28:29”. The assessed critical reading is “the verse is absent”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.
Necessary reasoning chain
- At Acts 28:29, the received Hebrew/Greek form is “the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves”; the Authorized Version represents it as “And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.” — Acts 28:29”. The assessed critical form is “the verse is absent”.
- The received and critical forms are not the same at this locus. Therefore, if the competing critical form is original, the received form is secondary rather than the authentic wording at this place. The immediate consequence is: At Acts 28:29, the received text reads “the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves” and its Authorized Version representation reads “And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.” — Acts 28:29”. The assessed critical reading is “the verse is absent”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.
- If the received form at this place is secondary rather than original, then the authentic Hebrew/Greek text was not kept pure at this place in the received textual tradition; therefore the unqualified confessional preservation claim must be denied or redefined.
Ultimate preservation consequence
If the competing reading is original and the received reading is secondary, then God did not preserve and keep pure the authentic text at this place in the received textual tradition. The unqualified confessional claim that Scripture was kept pure in all ages must therefore be denied or redefined.
Sources
- Westminster Confession of Faith (1647)Chapter 1, section 8 — Governing confessional preservation claim
- F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek according to the Text followed in the Authorized VersionReceived Greek reading
- Digital ECM — Acts 28:29Current critical-edition, ECM, or editorial documentation
- Doctrinally Significant Variants Itemisedsupplied PDF pp. 29–30 — Attributed doctrinal and canonical-coherence argument
- German Bible Society — UBS6 publications and relation to NA29Current critical-edition, ECM, or editorial documentation
Read the full research essay and its sources
Passage: Acts 28:29
Received reading: the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves
Principal competing reading: the verse is absent
Issue class: Whole-Verse Omission
Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.
Acts 28:29 narrates the immediate result of Paul’s final word from
Isaiah: his Jewish hearers leave while debating vigorously among
themselves. SBLGNT and NA28 omit the whole verse, moving directly from
the quotation and Gentile announcement to Paul’s two-year Roman
ministry.
“And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great
reasoning among themselves.” — Acts 28:29
“The
Jews Departed, and Had Great Reasoning among Themselves”
For Acts 28:29, the received side may be summarized as “the Jews
departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.” Its principal rival
is “the verse is absent.”
The omission at Acts 28:29 must be measured by its actual extent: it
changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may
remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words
nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.
The immediate sequence gives Acts 28:29 a concrete setting: Acts
28:28 says, “Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God
is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.” Acts 28:30 says,
“And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all
that came in unto him,.”
Keep the received verse as the natural narrative hinge between the
divided audience and Luke’s concluding summary.
Sources and further reading
- The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, Acts 28:29.
- F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek
according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version (1894),
Acts 28:29. - Michael W. Holmes, ed., The Greek New Testament: SBL
Edition, Acts 28:29 and apparatus. - Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New
Testament, discussion at Acts 28:29.
7Related materials
Open a group to follow connected articles, books, biographies, media, research notes, variants, or downloads. Research Center relationships use permanent record IDs; external items retain their actual link.
- Record
- VAR-2305
- Status
- Preliminary
- Version
- 1.1-dossier
- Review
- Level B — Editorial synthesis
- Editor
- Chris Thomas
- Reviewer
- Independent reviewer pending assignment
- First date
- 1st century · Date Range
- Last revised
- 2026-07-22
Evidence and editorial controls
- Verification
- Passage, received reading, principal SBLGNT reading, and reported NA28 alignment checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the official SBLGNT text and comparison apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.
- Rights and access
- Original editorial synthesis. Authorized Version Scripture is public domain in the United States; cited editions and digital witnesses retain their stated rights and access conditions.
- Known limitations
- This staging record summarizes the defined variation unit and representative edition evidence. It is not a fresh collation of every extant manuscript, version, lectionary, patristic citation, or ECM coherence relation.
Links from this record
No public outgoing links are recorded.
Records that cite or connect here
No public backlinks are recorded.
Corrections and evidence submissions
No correction submission is presently attached to this record. Submit evidence or read the correction policy.
Chris Thomas, “Acts 28:29 — “The Jews Departed, and Had Great Reasoning among Themselves”,” VAR-2305, Confessional Bibliology Research Center, version 1.0-staging, last revised 2026-07-22.
Revision history
- — Chris Thomas