Confessional Bibliology — Scripture Alone, Preserved by Providence

Complete textual-variant dossier

Sections distinguish readings, edition history, evidence, theological consequences, and the Research Center's evaluation. CBGM is an analytical tool; editorial committees—not the software—make textual decisions.

1Passage and issue

Passage

Issue

Scrivener names τοῦ κυρίου, ‘the Lord’; SBLGNT and NA28 use the pronoun αὐτοῦ, ‘his.’ The antecedent remains the risen Jesus who appeared to Paul and sent Ananias, but the received form states the title rather than leaving it pronominal.

Variant class

Omission / addition

2Textus Receptus

Greek reading

wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord

Authorized Version

“And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” —

Edition note

The Research Center uses the received Greek text underlying the Authorized Version as its baseline; edition-specific differences are recorded when the variation unit requires them.

3NA28 baseline and critical-text rationale

NA28 baseline reading

wash away your sins, calling on his name

Translation or explanation

wash away your sins, calling on his name

Metzger’s report of the UBS committee

No passage-specific Metzger synopsis has yet passed editorial verification for this record.

ECM / CBGM evidence and editors

No passage-specific ECM/CBGM editorial explanation is attached to this record. Official method sources describe the CBGM as a set of coherence procedures, not a decision-maker: editors define variation units and local stemmata and evaluate pre-genealogical, genealogical, and stemmatic coherence together with transcriptional, intrinsic, and other philological evidence.

4UBS6 and intended NA29 revision

No UBS6 / intended NA29 main-text change is recorded for this passage in the controlled 169-change ledger.

No change row is attached to this passage.

UBS6 is published, and the German Bible Society identifies its Greek main text as identical to the intended NA29 main text. The complete NA29 volume and its apparatus remain forthcoming. Project-ledger rows retain their source and verification statements until they are checked against the published UBS6 text and, when available, the NA29 apparatus.

5Doctrinal and four-point analysis

Effect class

Exegetical or interpretive consequence

Exact proposition affected

The bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Doctrinal analysis

Exegetical or interpretive consequence. The record does not establish that the variant by itself removes an entire Christian doctrine; explicit wording, exegesis, and cumulative testimony must be distinguished.

Bahnsen four-point examination

Arbitrariness

At , the critical choice avoids arbitrariness only to the extent that it states public manuscript, transcriptional, and intrinsic grounds. Passage: Received reading: wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord Principal competing reading: wash away your sins, calling on his name Issue class: Textual Variant Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. The critical or alternative presentation reads “wash away your sins, calling on his name.”

Inconsistency

The criteria used at must be applied to comparable readings as well. A principle such as age, difficulty, brevity, or coherence cannot be decisive here and quietly reversed elsewhere merely to escape a historical, grammatical, or theological difficulty.

Consequences

Exegetical or interpretive consequence: The bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Preconditions of intelligibility

The argument presupposes stable authorship, meaningful language, objective logical norms, transmissible evidence, and a coherent account of how Scripture can be received and identified by the church. The analysis tests whether the method can make those conditions intelligible without reducing the text to an indefinitely revisable editorial construct.

This framework examines an argument and its conditions; it does not claim to read an editor's private motives.

6Argument for the received reading

External and historical evidence

The immediate sequence gives a concrete setting: says, “For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard.” Sources and further reading The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, . Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version (1894), .

Internal and transcriptional evidence

A source-level internal and transcriptional synopsis remains open; consult the full essay.

Reception and ecclesiastical use

The received reading and its ecclesiastical use require passage-specific documentation; the age of a witness and the age of a reading must not be confused.

Providential-preservation analysis

Providential preservation is not used as a substitute for evidence at . It supplies the confessional context in which manuscript transmission, broad reception, and the church's actual possession of Scripture are evaluated together.

Canonical coherence with the rest of Scripture

Canonical coherence remains an explicit test: a proposed reading must make grammatical and theological sense within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. No conflict is asserted merely because two editions differ; the claimed incoherence must be demonstrated at this passage.

Canonical-coherence verdict

The Authorized Version is retained where its representation of the TR forms a coherent reading within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. Any competing form must demonstrate an equal or better canonical fit rather than merely invoke an edition or method label.

Response to the principal critical argument

Passage: Received reading: wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord Principal competing reading: wash away your sins, calling on his name Issue class: Textual Variant Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. The critical or alternative presentation reads “wash away your sins, calling on his name.”

Conclusion

The immediate sequence gives a concrete setting: says, “For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard.” says, “And it came to pass, that, when I was come again to Jerusalem, even while I prayed in the temple, I was in a trance.”

Preserve ‘the Lord’ as the explicit object of Paul’s invocation.

Read the full research essay and its sources

Passage:

Received reading: wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord

Principal competing reading: wash away your sins, calling on his name

Issue class: Textual Variant

Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.

“And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy
sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” —

contains a textual variant embedded in Luke’s
narrative.

Scrivener names τοῦ κυρίου, ‘the Lord’; SBLGNT and NA28 use the
pronoun αὐτοῦ, ‘his.’ The antecedent remains the risen Jesus who
appeared to Paul and sent Ananias, but the received form states the
title rather than leaving it pronominal.

In received form, Luke’s words are represented by “wash away thy
sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” The critical or alternative
presentation reads “wash away your sins, calling on his name.”

The variation at changes emphasis or explicitness within
an otherwise recognizable account; shared words should be acknowledged
before the distinct reading is defended, and the difference should not
be enlarged beyond the clause that carries it.

The immediate sequence gives a concrete setting: Acts
22:15 says, “For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou
hast seen and heard.” says, “And it came to pass, that, when
I was come again to Jerusalem, even while I prayed in the temple, I was
in a trance.”

Preserve ‘the Lord’ as the explicit object of Paul’s invocation.

Sources and further reading

  • The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, .
  • F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek
    according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version
    (1894),
    .
  • Michael W. Holmes, ed., The Greek New Testament: SBL
    Edition
    , and apparatus.

7Related materials

Open a group to follow connected articles, books, biographies, media, research notes, variants, or downloads. Research Center relationships use permanent record IDs; external items retain their actual link.

Record
VAR-2289
Status
Preliminary
Version
1.1-dossier
Review
Level B — Editorial synthesis
Editor
Chris Thomas
Reviewer
Independent reviewer pending assignment
First date
1st century · Date Range
Last revised
2026-07-22

Evidence and editorial controls

Verification
Passage, received reading, principal SBLGNT reading, and reported NA28 alignment checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the official SBLGNT text and comparison apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation.
Rights and access
Original editorial synthesis. Authorized Version Scripture is public domain in the United States; cited editions and digital witnesses retain their stated rights and access conditions.
Known limitations
This staging record summarizes the defined variation unit and representative edition evidence. It is not a fresh collation of every extant manuscript, version, lectionary, patristic citation, or ECM coherence relation.

Links from this record

No public outgoing links are recorded.

Records that cite or connect here

No public backlinks are recorded.

Corrections and evidence submissions

No correction submission is presently attached to this record. Submit evidence or read the correction policy.

Recommended citation

Chris Thomas, “Acts 22:16 — “Calling on the Name of the Lord”: Does the Title Belong?,” VAR-2289, Confessional Bibliology Research Center, version 1.0-staging, last revised 2026-07-22.

Revision history
  1. — Chris Thomas