Journal of Confessional Bibliology — Scripture Alone, Preserved by Providence

Complete textual-variant dossier

No adverse entailment · agrees with the received text

Sections distinguish readings, edition history, evidence, theological consequences, and the Research Center's evaluation. CBGM is an analytical tool; editorial committees—not the software—make textual decisions.

1Passage and issue

Passage

Issue

The Greek noun ἀνάστασις is the ordinary word for resurrection and is textually stable here.

Variant class

Substitution or composite variation

2Textus Receptus

Greek reading

he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection

Authorized Version

“Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.” —

Edition note

The Research Center uses the received Greek text underlying the Authorized Version as its baseline; edition-specific differences are recorded when the variation unit requires them.

Historical annotation witness

Erasmus’s Annotationes

Erasmus’s printed Greek text, his Latin annotation, and the Research Center’s evaluation are distinct evidence. Each edition remains separately identified because Erasmus revised the Annotationes across his five editions.

Not yet assessed. No inference about Erasmus’s silence has been made. A Latin annotation and translation will appear here only after an edition and exact locus have been verified.

The Erasmus annotation audit has not yet been completed for this locus. Do not infer from this status that Erasmus was silent.

Westminster and Dutch annotation witnesses

Westminster Annotations

Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.

Dutch Annotations

Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.

3NA28 baseline and critical-text rationale

NA28 baseline reading

he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection

Translation or explanation

he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection

Metzger’s report of the UBS committee

Metzger reports the UBS4 committee's treatment of 2 variation units within this record's range. The notes ground the relevant decisions in the weight and distribution of external attestation, a proposed mechanism of accidental omission, scribal harmonization to a parallel passage, the likelihood of scribal or liturgical expansion; the printed confidence rating represented here is {B}. This is a controlled synopsis rather than a quotation.

Locator: Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed., notes on :18

ECM / CBGM evidence and editors

No passage-specific ECM/CBGM editorial explanation is attached to this record. Official method sources describe the CBGM as a set of coherence procedures, not a decision-maker: editors define variation units and local stemmata and evaluate pre-genealogical, genealogical, and stemmatic coherence together with transcriptional, intrinsic, and other philological evidence.

4UBS6 and intended NA29 revision

No UBS6 / intended NA29 main-text change is recorded for this passage in the controlled 169-change ledger.

No change row is attached to this passage.

UBS6 is published, and the German Bible Society identifies its Greek main text as identical to the intended NA29 main text. The complete NA29 volume and its apparatus remain forthcoming. Project-ledger rows retain their source and verification statements until they are checked against the published UBS6 text and, when available, the NA29 apparatus.

5Doctrinal and four-point analysis

Effect class

Weakening of explicit biblical testimony

Exact proposition affected

The bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Doctrinal analysis

Passage: Received reading: he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection Principal competing reading: he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection Issue class: Interpretation / Agreement Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.” The Greek noun ἀνάστασις is the ordinary word for resurrection and is textually stable here.

Bahnsen four-point examination

Arbitrariness

At , the critical choice avoids arbitrariness only to the extent that it states public manuscript, transcriptional, and intrinsic grounds. Passage: Received reading: he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection Principal competing reading: he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection Issue class: Interpretation / Agreement Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. Agreement at is not filler in a complete survey: it establishes that the focal claim remains available in both governing Greek controls and tests any allegation that modern editions weaken this particular passage; here they do not.

Inconsistency

The criteria used at must be applied to comparable readings as well. A principle such as age, difficulty, brevity, or coherence cannot be decisive here and quietly reversed elsewhere merely to escape a historical, grammatical, or theological difficulty.

Consequences

Weakening of explicit biblical testimony: Passage: Received reading: he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection Principal competing reading: he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection Issue class: Interpretation / Agreement Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.” The Greek noun ἀνάστασις is the ordinary word for resurrection and is textually stable here.

Preconditions of intelligibility

The argument presupposes stable authorship, meaningful language, objective logical norms, transmissible evidence, and a coherent account of how Scripture can be received and identified by the church. The analysis tests whether the method can make those conditions intelligible without reducing the text to an indefinitely revisable editorial construct.

This framework examines an argument and its conditions; it does not claim to read an editor's private motives.

6Argument for the received reading

External and historical evidence

Not every difficulty attached to is a manuscript difference. Treat the goddess proposal as historical interpretation, not as a manuscript variant; the text says Paul preached Jesus and resurrection. Sources and further reading The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, .

Internal and transcriptional evidence

A source-level internal and transcriptional synopsis remains open; consult the full essay.

Reception and ecclesiastical use

Scrivener’s received text underlies the reading “he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.”

Providential-preservation analysis

Providential preservation is not used as a substitute for evidence at . It supplies the confessional context in which manuscript transmission, broad reception, and the church's actual possession of Scripture are evaluated together.

Canonical coherence with the rest of Scripture

Canonical coherence remains an explicit test: a proposed reading must make grammatical and theological sense within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. No conflict is asserted merely because two editions differ; the claimed incoherence must be demonstrated at this passage.

Canonical-coherence verdict

The Authorized Version is retained where its representation of the TR forms a coherent reading within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. Any competing form must demonstrate an equal or better canonical fit rather than merely invoke an edition or method label.

Response to the principal critical argument

Passage: Received reading: he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection Principal competing reading: he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection Issue class: Interpretation / Agreement Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. Agreement at is not filler in a complete survey: it establishes that the focal claim remains available in both governing Greek controls and tests any allegation that modern editions weaken this particular passage; here they do not.

Conclusion

Read in place, stands beside stable narrative statements: says, “Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him.” says, “And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?”

Treat the goddess proposal as historical interpretation, not as a manuscript variant; the text says Paul preached Jesus and resurrection.

Logical entailment

The Authorized Version serves as the faithful English representation. The preservation claim applies immediately to the authentic Hebrew and Greek texts—not to an English translation as though it were the inspired source.

Canonical-status rule: Physical printing is not canonical inclusion. If an edition prints a passage in double brackets while judging it secondary or non-original, it disagrees with the received text concerning the identity and extent of inspired Scripture.

No adverse entailment: agrees with the received text.

Necessary reasoning chain

  1. The current critical main-text reading assessed at agrees with the received Hebrew/Greek reading at the variation unit governed by this card.
  2. An adverse preservation entailment at this locus would require the current critical form to displace a different received reading.
  3. Because no such displacement occurs at the assessed locus, no adverse preservation consequence follows here.

Sources

Read the full research essay and its sources

Passage:

Received reading: he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection

Principal competing reading: he proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection

Issue class: Interpretation / Agreement

Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.

“Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks,
encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some,
He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached
unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.” —

Not every difficulty attached to is a manuscript
difference.

The Greek noun ἀνάστασις is the ordinary word for resurrection and is
textually stable here. Some interpreters propose that Athenians mistook
the feminine noun for the name of a goddess paired with Jesus, but Luke
only says that they regarded Paul as proclaiming foreign divinities.

Scrivener’s received text underlies the reading “he preached unto
them Jesus, and the resurrection.” The principal competing form is “he
proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection.”

Agreement at is not filler in a complete survey: it
establishes that the focal claim remains available in both governing
Greek controls and tests any allegation that modern editions weaken this
particular passage; here they do not.

Read in place, stands beside stable narrative statements:
says, “Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews,
and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met
with him.” says, “And they took him, and brought him unto
Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou
speakest, is?”

Treat the goddess proposal as historical interpretation, not as a
manuscript variant; the text says Paul preached Jesus and
resurrection.

Sources and further reading

  • The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, .
  • F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek
    according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version
    (1894),
    .
  • Michael W. Holmes, ed., The Greek New Testament: SBL
    Edition
    , and apparatus.

7Related materials

Open a group to follow connected articles, books, biographies, media, research notes, variants, or downloads. Research Center relationships use permanent record IDs; external items retain their actual link.

Record
VAR-2271
Status
Preliminary
Version
1.1-dossier
Review
Level B — Editorial synthesis
Editor
Chris Thomas
Reviewer
Independent reviewer pending assignment
First date
1st century · Date Range
Last revised
2026-07-22

Evidence and editorial controls

Verification
Passage, received reading, principal SBLGNT reading, and reported NA28 alignment checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the official SBLGNT text and comparison apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation.
Rights and access
Original editorial synthesis. Authorized Version Scripture is public domain in the United States; cited editions and digital witnesses retain their stated rights and access conditions.
Known limitations
This staging record summarizes the defined variation unit and representative edition evidence. It is not a fresh collation of every extant manuscript, version, lectionary, patristic citation, or ECM coherence relation.

Links from this record

No public outgoing links are recorded.

Records that cite or connect here

No public backlinks are recorded.

Corrections and evidence submissions

No correction submission is presently attached to this record. Submit evidence or read the correction policy.

Recommended citation

Chris Thomas, “Acts 17:18 — “Jesus and the Resurrection”: Did the Athenians Mistake *Anastasis* for a Goddess?,” VAR-2271, Confessional Bibliology Research Center, version 1.0-staging, last revised 2026-07-22.

Revision history
  1. — Chris Thomas