English translation of Epitome grammaticae Hebraeae
A Short Introduction to the Hebrew Tongue
A Translation of the Learned John Buxtorfius' Epitome of His Hebrew Grammar
Johann Buxtorf; John Davis · 1655 [imprint dated 1656]
London: Printed by Roger Daniel for Humphrey Moseley at the Prince's Arms in St. Paul's Church-yard, anno 1656 [Thomason copy annotated November 13, 1655].
Overview
John Davis's English translation of Buxtorf's epitome introduces Hebrew grammar for readers without Latin. It includes interlinear English interpretation of selected Hebrew Psalms and rules concerning accents, nouns, verbs, participles, pronoun affixes, and indeclinable words.
Overview
John Davis's English translation of Buxtorf's epitome introduces Hebrew grammar for readers without Latin. It includes interlinear English interpretation of selected Hebrew Psalms and rules concerning accents, nouns, verbs, participles, pronoun affixes, and indeclinable words.
Editorial Evaluation
Purpose Fulfillment
Does the work accomplish what it claims to accomplish?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Source Quality
Does it use the appropriate primary and secondary sources?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Citation Accuracy
Are quotations, references, and claims verifiable and in context?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Evidence Coverage
Does it address the relevant evidence, including contrary evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Historical Accuracy
Are people, dates, editions, events, and settings handled correctly?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Subject Competence
Does the author demonstrate competence in the relevant disciplines?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Logical Coherence
Do the conclusions follow from the premises and evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Methodological Transparency
Are the method and controlling assumptions identifiable and consistent?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Strongest-Form Engagement
Does the work address the strongest opposing case rather than a caricature?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Clarity and Research Usefulness
Is it intelligible, navigable, and useful for further study?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.