Christian Publication and Ecclesiastical Judgment
A definition of what a lay theological publication may and may not do, distinguishing criticism from censure, argument from adjudication, and publication from ordination.
Open record →13 published records in this controlled archive.
A definition of what a lay theological publication may and may not do, distinguishing criticism from censure, argument from adjudication, and publication from ordination.
Open record →An application of the fifth and ninth commandments to theological controversy, including honor, evidence, context, motive, tone, naming, and proportionality.
Open record →A framework for distinguishing factual error, inconsistency, sin, dangerous teaching, heresy, ministerial disqualification, and formal ecclesiastical judgment.
Open record →A defense of the duty to test arguments by Scripture, evidence, and valid reasoning while giving expertise and ecclesiastical office their proper but limited weight.
Open record →A biblical analysis of the circumstances in which silence ceases to be prudence and becomes a culpable failure to confess, warn, or protect the church.
Open record →Public theological teaching may ordinarily receive a proportionate public answer without misusing Matthew 18, while charity, accuracy, and restoration still govern the response.
Open record →