The Jurisdiction Safeguard: Editorial Judgment Is Not Church Censure
A publication may judge doctrine and warn readers, but it must not present its verdict as a binding ecclesiastical sentence.
Open record →17 published records in this controlled archive.
A publication may judge doctrine and warn readers, but it must not present its verdict as a binding ecclesiastical sentence.
Open record →Christian polemics must reject selective quotation, exaggeration, guilt by association, suppressed contrary evidence, and unproved claims about motive.
Open record →Ecclesiastical office must receive proper honor, yet no office makes public doctrine immune from biblical examination and correction.
Open record →The force, publicity, duration, and repetition of criticism should correspond to the seriousness, reach, persistence, and danger of the error.
Open record →Error, serious error, unconfessional teaching, material heresy, formal obstinacy, damnable heresy, and disqualification are related but distinct judgments.
Open record →Documentary facts, necessary inferences, probable implications, theological judgments, and claims about motive require different evidence.
Open record →