Journal of Confessional Bibliology — Scripture Alone, Preserved by Providence

First edition

A New Approach to Textual Criticism

An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method

Peter J. Gurry; Tommy Wasserman · 2017

Atlanta: SBL Press; Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017.

MagisterialComplete Library RecordCatalog Record Only
Editorial research score9.4out of 10Color denotes textual methodology, not score.

Overview

Wasserman and Gurry give the first book-length English introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method used in the Catholic Epistles and Acts of the Editio Critica Maior. They explain local stemmata, potential ancestors and descendants, pre-genealogical and genealogical coherence, textual flow diagrams, contamination, and the relationship between editorial decisions and computer-assisted analysis. Worked examples show how the CBGM can expose or challenge existing judgments without functioning as an automatic text-generating algorithm.

The book is exceptionally clear about both the power and the limits of the method. It stresses that editors first decide the direction of variants, that the resulting genealogical data can then feed back into those decisions, and that versional and patristic evidence were not yet fully integrated. That candor makes it a reliable guide even for readers who dispute the method's initial-text goal.

Scripture Passage Coverage

1 John 5:6

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Discusses without deciding

Illustrates the construction and use of local stemmata.

1 Peter 1:23

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Discusses without deciding

Used to explain coherence and potential ancestry.

1 Peter 4:16

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Qualified or mixed conclusion

Demonstrates how genealogical coherence may affect an editorial decision.

1 Peter 5:10

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Discusses without deciding

Used in analysis of textual flow and witness relationships.

2 Peter 3:10

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Qualified or mixed conclusion

Shows how a difficult variation unit is modeled and reconsidered.

Acts 1:26

Brief treatment · Acts examples

Discusses without deciding

Provides an example from the later application of the method to Acts.

Acts 20:28

Brief treatment · Acts examples

Qualified or mixed conclusion

Discusses competing readings in relation to the evolving ECM text.

James 2:23

Substantial treatment · worked CBGM examples

Discusses without deciding

Illustrates local stemmata and the evaluation of variant relationships.

Mark 1:1

Brief treatment · future applications

Discusses without deciding

Used to illustrate possible application beyond the Catholic Epistles and Acts.

Catalog ID: CBL-024270 · Rights: Purchase or borrowing link · Verification: Verified