James White, Inconsistency, & Lying ##UPDATE#3 (29SEP2019): On the Dividing Line from 24 Sep 2019, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA9aoDtJx08) Mr. White attempted to deal with this post and failed multiple ways. First, he equivocated between disputed texts and words only used once in Scripture. But it is no … Read More
Textus Receptus – Default Text or Chosen Text?
One of the oft made claims of a popular apologist in evangelical circles is that the Reformers did not choose the Textus Receptus, but that they used it because they had no other options. Is that true? Were there no other Greek New Testaments during … Read More
Follow Up: Codex Montfortianus, Erasmus, and 1 John 5:7
In a previous article I addressed the issue of Codex Montfortianus and Erasmus and showed that the so called “British” Codex that Erasmus used could not be Codex Montfortianus. I was pleased to find out that Dr. White responded to my article during his Dividing … Read More
NT Manuscripts Made to Order (Erasmus and I Jn5.7)
It is commonly known that Erasmus did not include a large section of 1 John 5:7 in the 1st and 2nd Editions of his Greek New Testament. This is the so called Comma Johanneum, “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, … Read More
A Short Response to James White
Faulty Facts and Assumptions On Thursday, June 9th, James White posted in the Reformed Pub about the Comma Johanneum. Like most of Mr. White’s previous interactions with those of us that hold to the Confessional view of Scripture, Mr. White failed to understand the key … Read More
Erasmian Myths: Codex Vaticanus
Erasmus & Codex Vaticanus [Part 1: Erasmus & the Comma Johanneum] In part 2 of our series, The Erasmian Myths, we will deal with the oft repeated, but never proven claim, that Erasmus didn’t have access to Codex Vaticanus, but if he did he would … Read More