
Post · August 29, 2026Eusebius and Jerome cannot be suppressed in a defense of Mark 16:9–20; they report copies which lacked the ending. But neither Father simply declares the passage spurious, and…
Open record → 
Post · August 22, 2026Irenaeus does not merely allude to Christ’s ascension. He expressly says that Mark, near the conclusion of his Gospel, wrote Mark 16:19. This second-century witness does not answer…
Open record → 
Post · August 15, 2026The early evidence for the woman taken in adultery is neither a single unbroken manuscript chain nor an empty silence. This article weighs what the Didascalia, Didymus, Ambrose,…
Open record → 
Post · August 8, 2026Augustine’s testimony concerning John 7:53–8:11 does not settle every question of transmission by itself. It does establish that a leading Father received the passage as Scripture, knew of…
Open record → 
Post · August 1, 2026The identity and authority of Holy Scripture are not sidelines in the life of the church. Treating their destruction as a harmless intramural disagreement is not charity. It…
Open record → 
Post · July 23, 2026Calling Confessional Bibliology “KJV-only,” “TR-only,” or “Ruckmanite” does not answer its doctrine of preservation. When a loaded label is made to carry the argument, it becomes an act…
Open record →