Follow Up: Codex Montfortianus, Erasmus, and 1 John 5:7
In a previous article I addressed the issue of Codex Montfortianus and Erasmus and showed that the so called "British" Codex that Erasmus used could not be Codex…
Open record →6 published records in this controlled archive.
In a previous article I addressed the issue of Codex Montfortianus and Erasmus and showed that the so called "British" Codex that Erasmus used could not be Codex…
Open record →It is commonly known that Erasmus did not include a large section of 1 John 5:7 in the 1st and 2nd Editions of his Greek New Testament. This…
Open record →Faulty Facts and Assumptions On Thursday, June 9th, James White posted in the Reformed Pub about the Comma Johanneum. Like most of Mr. White's previous interactions with those…
Open record →How should we think about arguments against the traditional human authorship of a certain passage or book of Scripture based on style and word choice, such as this…
Open record →The "floating tradition" argument against the authenticity of the Pericope Adulterae PA , John 7:53-8:11, is summarized well by Bruce Metzger in 1964, " The pericope is obviously…
Open record →"The Scripture is the Word of God written in a language fit for the Church by men immediately called to be the Clerkes, or Secretaries of the Holy…
Open record →