Journal of Confessional Bibliology — Scripture Alone, Preserved by Providence

Complete textual-variant dossier

Adverse entailment established

Sections distinguish readings, edition history, evidence, theological consequences, and the Research Center's evaluation. CBGM is an analytical tool; editorial committees—not the software—make textual decisions.

1Passage and issue

Passage

Issue

Scrivener identifies the hostile Jews as ‘those who disbelieved’ and then narrates their recruitment of marketplace idlers.

Variant class

Omission / addition

2Textus Receptus

Greek reading

the Jews which believed not, moved with envy

Authorized Version

“But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.” —

Edition note

The Research Center uses the received Greek text underlying the Authorized Version as its baseline; edition-specific differences are recorded when the variation unit requires them.

Historical annotation witness

Erasmus’s Annotationes

Erasmus’s printed Greek text, his Latin annotation, and the Research Center’s evaluation are distinct evidence. Each edition remains separately identified because Erasmus revised the Annotationes across his five editions.

Not yet assessed. No inference about Erasmus’s silence has been made. A Latin annotation and translation will appear here only after an edition and exact locus have been verified.

The Erasmus annotation audit has not yet been completed for this locus. Do not infer from this status that Erasmus was silent.

Westminster and Dutch annotation witnesses

Westminster Annotations

Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.

Dutch Annotations

Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.

3NA28 baseline and critical-text rationale

NA28 baseline reading

the Jews became jealous

Translation or explanation

the Jews became jealous

Metzger’s report of the UBS committee

Metzger reports the UBS4 committee's treatment of the variation unit. The note grounds the relevant decision in the balance of external and internal evidence described in the entry. This is a controlled synopsis rather than a quotation.

Locator: Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed., note on

ECM / CBGM evidence and editors

No passage-specific ECM/CBGM editorial explanation is attached to this record. Official method sources describe the CBGM as a set of coherence procedures, not a decision-maker: editors define variation units and local stemmata and evaluate pre-genealogical, genealogical, and stemmatic coherence together with transcriptional, intrinsic, and other philological evidence.

4UBS6 and intended NA29 revision

No UBS6 / intended NA29 main-text change is recorded for this passage in the controlled 169-change ledger.

No change row is attached to this passage.

UBS6 is published, and the German Bible Society identifies its Greek main text as identical to the intended NA29 main text. The complete NA29 volume and its apparatus remain forthcoming. Project-ledger rows retain their source and verification statements until they are checked against the published UBS6 text and, when available, the NA29 apparatus.

5Doctrinal and four-point analysis

Effect class

Exegetical or interpretive consequence

Exact proposition affected

No single doctrinal proposition is directly changed; the principal consequence is exegetical, historical, or cumulative.

Doctrinal analysis

The omission at must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.

Bahnsen four-point examination

Arbitrariness

At , the critical choice avoids arbitrariness only to the extent that it states public manuscript, transcriptional, and intrinsic grounds. Passage: Received reading: the Jews which believed not, moved with envy Principal competing reading: the Jews became jealous Issue class: Clause Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.

Inconsistency

The criteria used at must be applied to comparable readings as well. A principle such as age, difficulty, brevity, or coherence cannot be decisive here and quietly reversed elsewhere merely to escape a historical, grammatical, or theological difficulty.

Consequences

Exegetical or interpretive consequence: The omission at must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.

Preconditions of intelligibility

The argument presupposes stable authorship, meaningful language, objective logical norms, transmissible evidence, and a coherent account of how Scripture can be received and identified by the church. The analysis tests whether the method can make those conditions intelligible without reducing the text to an indefinitely revisable editorial construct.

This framework examines an argument and its conditions; it does not claim to read an editor's private motives.

6Argument for the received reading

External and historical evidence

Sources and further reading The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, . Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version (1894), .

Internal and transcriptional evidence

Passage: Received reading: the Jews which believed not, moved with envy Principal competing reading: the Jews became jealous Issue class: Clause Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. SBLGNT and NA28 omit οἱ ἀπειθοῦντες and describe the Jews’ jealousy without that explicit qualifier. The omission at must be measured by its actual extent: it changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.

Reception and ecclesiastical use

The received reading and its ecclesiastical use require passage-specific documentation; the age of a witness and the age of a reading must not be confused.

Providential-preservation analysis

Providential preservation is not used as a substitute for evidence at . It supplies the confessional context in which manuscript transmission, broad reception, and the church's actual possession of Scripture are evaluated together.

Canonical coherence with the rest of Scripture

Canonical coherence remains an explicit test: a proposed reading must make grammatical and theological sense within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. No conflict is asserted merely because two editions differ; the claimed incoherence must be demonstrated at this passage.

Canonical-coherence verdict

The Authorized Version is retained where its representation of the TR forms a coherent reading within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. Any competing form must demonstrate an equal or better canonical fit rather than merely invoke an edition or method label.

Response to the principal critical argument

Passage: Received reading: the Jews which believed not, moved with envy Principal competing reading: the Jews became jealous Issue class: Clause Omission Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.

Conclusion

Luke does not leave isolated from its setting. Just outside the selected unit, says, “And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, and of the chief women not a few.” says, “And when they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also.”

Retain the received participle because it distinguishes the opponents by their unbelieving response to Paul’s preaching.

Logical entailment

The Authorized Version serves as the faithful English representation. The preservation claim applies immediately to the authentic Hebrew and Greek texts—not to an English translation as though it were the inspired source.

Canonical-status rule: Physical printing is not canonical inclusion. If an edition prints a passage in double brackets while judging it secondary or non-original, it disagrees with the received text concerning the identity and extent of inspired Scripture.

Status: Established

Immediate textual or doctrinal consequence

At , the received text reads “the Jews which believed not, moved with envy” and its Authorized Version representation reads “But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.” — ”. The assessed critical reading is “the Jews became jealous”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.

Necessary reasoning chain

  1. At , the received Hebrew/Greek form is “the Jews which believed not, moved with envy”; the Authorized Version represents it as “But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.” — ”. The assessed critical form is “the Jews became jealous”.
  2. The received and critical forms are not the same at this locus. Therefore, if the competing critical form is original, the received form is secondary rather than the authentic wording at this place. The immediate consequence is: At , the received text reads “the Jews which believed not, moved with envy” and its Authorized Version representation reads “But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.” — ”. The assessed critical reading is “the Jews became jealous”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.
  3. If the received form at this place is secondary rather than original, then the authentic Hebrew/Greek text was not kept pure at this place in the received textual tradition; therefore the unqualified confessional preservation claim must be denied or redefined.

Ultimate preservation consequence

If the competing reading is original and the received reading is secondary, then God did not preserve and keep pure the authentic text at this place in the received textual tradition. The unqualified confessional claim that Scripture was kept pure in all ages must therefore be denied or redefined.

Sources

Read the full research essay and its sources

Passage:

Received reading: the Jews which believed not, moved with envy

Principal competing reading: the Jews became jealous

Issue class: Clause Omission

Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.

For , the received side may be summarized as “the Jews which
believed not, moved with envy.” Its principal rival is “the Jews became
jealous.”

“But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them
certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set
all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought
to bring them out to the people.” —

“The
Jews Which Believed Not” and Certain Lewd Fellows of the Baser Sort

Scrivener identifies the hostile Jews as ‘those who disbelieved’ and
then narrates their recruitment of marketplace idlers. SBLGNT and NA28
omit οἱ ἀπειθοῦντες and describe the Jews’ jealousy without that
explicit qualifier.

The omission at must be measured by its actual extent: it
changes a stated detail in the episode although broader doctrines may
remain elsewhere, a distinction that neither minimizes the missing words
nor assigns them consequences they cannot carry.

Luke does not leave isolated from its setting. Just outside
the selected unit, says, “And some of them believed, and
consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great
multitude, and of the chief women not a few.” says, “And when
they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the
rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down
are come hither also.”

Retain the received participle because it distinguishes the opponents
by their unbelieving response to Paul’s preaching.

Sources and further reading

  • The Holy Bible, Authorized Version, .
  • F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek
    according to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version
    (1894),
    .
  • Michael W. Holmes, ed., The Greek New Testament: SBL
    Edition
    , and apparatus.
  • Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New
    Testament
    , discussion at .

7Related materials

Open a group to follow connected articles, books, biographies, media, research notes, variants, or downloads. Research Center relationships use permanent record IDs; external items retain their actual link.

Record
VAR-2270
Status
Preliminary
Version
1.1-dossier
Review
Level B — Editorial synthesis
Editor
Chris Thomas
Reviewer
Independent reviewer pending assignment
First date
1st century · Date Range
Last revised
2026-07-22

Evidence and editorial controls

Verification
Passage, received reading, principal SBLGNT reading, and reported NA28 alignment checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the official SBLGNT text and comparison apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation.
Rights and access
Original editorial synthesis. Authorized Version Scripture is public domain in the United States; cited editions and digital witnesses retain their stated rights and access conditions.
Known limitations
This staging record summarizes the defined variation unit and representative edition evidence. It is not a fresh collation of every extant manuscript, version, lectionary, patristic citation, or ECM coherence relation.

Links from this record

No public outgoing links are recorded.

Records that cite or connect here

No public backlinks are recorded.

Corrections and evidence submissions

No correction submission is presently attached to this record. Submit evidence or read the correction policy.

Recommended citation

Chris Thomas, “Acts 17:5 — “The Jews Which Believed Not” and Certain Lewd Fellows of the Baser Sort,” VAR-2270, Confessional Bibliology Research Center, version 1.0-staging, last revised 2026-07-22.

Revision history
  1. — Chris Thomas