The received Greek uses γέννησις, “birth.” The critical text uses γένεσις, a broader word for origin, coming-to-be, or genesis. Only one Greek letter separates them.
“Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise.” — Matthew 1:18
Both lead into the conception and birth of Jesus. Neither permits a denial of the virgin birth. The narrower received word, however, names the event Matthew is about to narrate.
Matthew 1:1 begins, “The book of the generation”—βίβλος γενέσεως. Reading genesis again in verse 18 creates a literary frame: the genesis of Jesus Christ was in this way. Early witnesses support that form, and critics can explain “birth” as a copyist’s attempt to use the more expected term.
The frame may be real, but it may also be the cause of the change. A scribe who had just copied genesis at the opening could repeat the familiar spelling at verse 18. The two words sounded close and differed by a single consonant. Accidental assimilation requires no editorial theory.
“Birth” also fits the ancient versions and the broad Greek tradition. Matthew moves from the line of descent to the circumstances of the birth. He will tell how Mary came to be with child, what Joseph did, and why the child received his name.
No second creation of the Son
If genesis were original, it would speak of the human entrance of the eternal Son, not the beginning of his divine person. John says the Word was in the beginning with God. Matthew says the child conceived by the Holy Ghost is Emmanuel, God with us.
The received “birth” guards the immediate focus without carrying that whole doctrinal explanation in one noun. Jesus Christ did not begin to be God in Mary; he began his humbled human life in her womb and was born in Bethlehem.
The early evidence for γένεσις makes it a genuine rival, not a modern fancy. Yet its easy attraction to verse 1, the one-letter change, the wide reception of γέννησις, and the passage’s subject favor “birth.” The Authorized Version gives the right plain word: “Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise.”
English can make the two readings sound farther apart than they are. Genesis now evokes either the first biblical book or the absolute beginning of a thing. The Greek noun has a wider field. It may speak of origin, family line, existence, or birth according to its setting. A translation must therefore choose the live English sense, not merely preserve an English cognate.
The received noun also answers the structure of verses 18–25. Matthew does not proceed to speculate about the eternal origin of the Son. He tells when Mary was found with child, how Joseph learned the cause, why he took her as wife, and what name he gave the newborn. “Birth” announces the kind of narrative that follows.
At the same time, the critical reading can be preached without heresy. The eternal Son’s earthly genesis does not create his divine nature. This is a useful restraint on textual claims: the received form is better, but the rival must be judged by what its language can mean in context, not by the worst doctrine an English reader can attach to it.
Sources and further reading
- Matthew 1:1, 18–25; John 1:1–18; Philippians 2:5–11.
- Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, note on Matthew 1:18.
- Definition of Chalcedon.
Comments
Share a question or response to this article.