London edition
An Introduction to the Art of Rhetorick
Composed for the Benefit of Young Scholars and Others Who Have Not Opportunity of Being Instructed in the Latine Tongue
John Newton · 1671
London: Printed by E. T. and R. H. for Thomas Passenger at the Three Bibles on London Bridge, and Benjamin Hurlock over against St. Magnus Church, 1671.
Overview
An English-language introduction to rhetoric designed for students without Latin and expressly intended to help readers understand figurative expressions in Holy Scripture. It supplies a compact guide to rhetorical figures and their interpretive use.
Overview
An English-language introduction to rhetoric designed for students without Latin and expressly intended to help readers understand figurative expressions in Holy Scripture. It supplies a compact guide to rhetorical figures and their interpretive use.
Editorial Evaluation
Purpose Fulfillment
Does the work accomplish what it claims to accomplish?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Source Quality
Does it use the appropriate primary and secondary sources?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Citation Accuracy
Are quotations, references, and claims verifiable and in context?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Evidence Coverage
Does it address the relevant evidence, including contrary evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Historical Accuracy
Are people, dates, editions, events, and settings handled correctly?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Subject Competence
Does the author demonstrate competence in the relevant disciplines?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Logical Coherence
Do the conclusions follow from the premises and evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Methodological Transparency
Are the method and controlling assumptions identifiable and consistent?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Strongest-Form Engagement
Does the work address the strongest opposing case rather than a caricature?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Clarity and Research Usefulness
Is it intelligible, navigable, and useful for further study?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.