The Missing Position: Confessional Bibliology in White’s Taxonomy
Define the authentic Hebrew and Greek text as final authority and the KJV as a derivative, faithful translation.
Open record →Category: Refuting James R. White’s The King James Only Controversy
5 published records in this controlled archive.
The Pejorative Default: How “KJV-Only” Smuggles in English Inspiration
Critics often admit that Confessional Bibliology denies English inspiration, then restore that association through the KJV-Only label. Similarity, functional equivalence, and doctrinal identity require different kinds of proof.
Open record →Who Is a “King James Onlyist”? White’s Contradictory Definitions
White's broad five-group umbrella, his English-inspiration center, and his later exclusive-use test do not name the same class. A disputed label must be translated into a definite claim…
Open record →A Necessary Concession: Why Ruckmanism Is Not Confessional Bibliology
The Authorized Version was not inspired afresh and may not correct Hebrew or Greek. Granting White that point clears away Ruckmanism while leaving the confessional doctrine of original-language…
Open record →The Book We Are Answering: Edition, Scope, and the Controlling Question
A fair answer to James White must identify the editions, grant his sound case against English re-inspiration, and isolate the question his book has not settled: whether the…
Open record →