
Post · September 2, 2026Bahnsen used infallibility in its strongest sense, yet confined it formally to the autographic text. The decisive issue is not vocabulary but the present locus of final authority.
Open record → 
Post · September 1, 2026The absence of the physical autographs does not prove that the church lacks the authentic text; it raises the question whether the final rule is an extant Word…
Open record → 
Post · August 30, 2026Divine truthfulness is not a habit God might suspend. Scripture identifies the living God as the one who cannot lie, cannot deny himself, and performs every promise he…
Open record → 
Post · August 29, 2026Define the authentic Hebrew and Greek text as final authority and the KJV as a derivative, faithful translation.
Open record → 
Post · August 28, 2026The claim that Erasmus ignored or never had access to Codex Vaticanus usually confuses a physical codex, readings reported from it, and Erasmus’s own stated judgment about those…
Open record → 
Post · August 26, 2026Bahnsen’s doctrine was substantially Reformed at the point of Scripture’s divine production, but modern and Warfieldian at transmission, textual identity, and the continuing locus of the inspired Word.
Open record →