
Post · October 6, 2026A modern apparatus gives a necessary editorial summary, not a time machine. Alexandrinus must be judged through its material history, dated observers, transmissional possibilities, and ecclesiastical reception.
Open record → 
Post · October 6, 2026A manuscript’s manufacture, the age of its wording, its scholarly date assignment, and its documented provenance are four different chronological claims. Honest textual history must name which one…
Open record → 
Post · October 5, 2026Peter J. Gurry explicitly affirms inerrancy, so the question is whether his textual model preserves the object to which inerrancy meaningfully applies.
Open record → 
Post · October 4, 2026The vowel-point controversy requires exact claims about written signs, vocalization, authority, and doctrinal use rather than an appeal to famous names.
Open record → 
Post · October 4, 2026An unwanted conclusion can be escaped by retracting a premise, disproving a necessary connection, exposing equivocation, or showing invalid inference. Denial does not reroute an argument.
Open record →