
Post · September 2, 2026Historical investigation may serve the church, but it cannot become the court that decides what God has said. A probable reading cannot bear the same authority as a…
Open record → 
Post · September 2, 2026Dabney’s 1881 criticism of the Revised Version sharpens the ecclesial issue, but his case must be retained without treating him as infallible or freezing nineteenth-century evidence.
Open record → 
Post · September 2, 2026The first chapter verdict is now due. The critical corpus retains much of Westminster's doctrine of Scripture, but the question is whether it independently supplies the confession's historical…
Open record → 
Post · September 2, 2026Bahnsen used infallibility in its strongest sense, yet confined it formally to the autographic text. The decisive issue is not vocabulary but the present locus of final authority.
Open record → 
Post · September 1, 2026Textual criticism is possible only because reality is ordered, language is meaningful, testimony is knowable, truth is binding, and a determinate text exists. Those conditions require the Christian…
Open record →