English translation of Piscator's third and last edition
Aphorismes of Christian Religion
A Verie Compendious Abridgement of M. I. Calvins Institutions
Henry Holland; Johannes Piscator; John Calvin · 1596
London: Imprinted by Richard Field and Robert Dexter, and sold in Paul's Churchyard at the sign of the Brazen Serpent, 1596.
Overview
Johannes Piscator's methodical aphoristic abridgment of Calvin's Institutes, translated into English by Henry Holland. The work condenses Reformed doctrine into short propositions for study, teaching, and reference.
Overview
Johannes Piscator's methodical aphoristic abridgment of Calvin's Institutes, translated into English by Henry Holland. The work condenses Reformed doctrine into short propositions for study, teaching, and reference.
Editorial Evaluation
Purpose Fulfillment
Does the work accomplish what it claims to accomplish?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Source Quality
Does it use the appropriate primary and secondary sources?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Citation Accuracy
Are quotations, references, and claims verifiable and in context?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Evidence Coverage
Does it address the relevant evidence, including contrary evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Historical Accuracy
Are people, dates, editions, events, and settings handled correctly?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Subject Competence
Does the author demonstrate competence in the relevant disciplines?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Logical Coherence
Do the conclusions follow from the premises and evidence?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Methodological Transparency
Are the method and controlling assumptions identifiable and consistent?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Strongest-Form Engagement
Does the work address the strongest opposing case rather than a caricature?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.
Editorial Evaluation
Clarity and Research Usefulness
Is it intelligible, navigable, and useful for further study?
The full editorial rationale has not yet been entered.