Complete textual-variant dossier
Adverse entailment established
Sections distinguish readings, edition history, evidence, theological consequences, and the Research Center's evaluation. CBGM is an analytical tool; editorial committees—not the software—make textual decisions.
1Passage and issue
Passage
Issue
Two variations shape the paragraph: the received reminder “as I said unto you” and a difficult relative-pronoun cluster concerning the Father, the gift, and what is greater than all.
Variant class
Omission / addition
2Textus Receptus
Greek reading
Verse 26 includes “as I said unto you”; verse 29 reads, “My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all.”
Authorized Version
The Authorized Version rendering has not yet been entered in the structured field.
Edition note
The Research Center uses the received Greek text underlying the Authorized Version as its baseline; edition-specific differences are recorded when the variation unit requires them.
Historical annotation witness
Erasmus’s Annotationes
Erasmus’s printed Greek text, his Latin annotation, and the Research Center’s evaluation are distinct evidence. Each edition remains separately identified because Erasmus revised the Annotationes across his five editions.
Not yet assessed. No inference about Erasmus’s silence has been made. A Latin annotation and translation will appear here only after an edition and exact locus have been verified.
The Erasmus annotation audit has not yet been completed for this locus. Do not infer from this status that Erasmus was silent.
Westminster and Dutch annotation witnesses
Westminster Annotations
Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.
Dutch Annotations
Not yet assessed. No inference from silence is made.
3NA28 baseline and critical-text rationale
NA28 baseline reading
The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”
Translation or explanation
The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”
Metzger’s report of the UBS committee
Metzger reports the UBS4 committee's treatment of the variation unit. The note grounds the relevant decision in the balance of external and internal evidence described in the entry; the printed confidence rating represented here is {B}. This is a controlled synopsis rather than a quotation.
Locator: Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed., note on John 10:26
ECM / CBGM evidence and editors
No passage-specific ECM/CBGM editorial explanation is attached to this record. Official method sources describe the CBGM as a set of coherence procedures, not a decision-maker: editors define variation units and local stemmata and evaluate pre-genealogical, genealogical, and stemmatic coherence together with transcriptional, intrinsic, and other philological evidence.
4UBS6 and intended NA29 revision
UBS6 retains the NA28 / UBS5 Greek main-text wording in John, so no main-text change is shown for this passage. The separate project ledger covers Acts, Mark, and Revelation.
No change row is attached to this passage.
UBS6 is published, and the German Bible Society identifies its Greek main text as identical to the intended NA29 main text. The complete NA29 volume and its apparatus remain forthcoming. Project-ledger rows retain their source and verification statements until they are checked against the published UBS6 text and, when available, the NA29 apparatus.
5Doctrinal and four-point analysis
Effect class
Exegetical or interpretive consequence
Exact proposition affected
No single doctrinal proposition is directly changed; the principal consequence is exegetical, historical, or cumulative.
Doctrinal analysis
Exegetical or interpretive consequence. The record does not establish that the variant by itself removes an entire Christian doctrine; explicit wording, exegesis, and cumulative testimony must be distinguished.
Controlled source-list matches
Doctrinal significance and Westminster use
This passage is listed in one or both controlling research files. Their claims are reported with exact source identity and confessional use; list membership does not by itself establish the original reading or the Research Center’s final entailment.
Westminster proof-text listJohn 10:26
A List of Omissions and Changes Found in the Critical Text to Verses Used as Proof Texts in the Westminster Standards
Seth Stark — supplied source file pp. 52–53
Textual wording marked in the source
Received/NKJV side: as I said to you
Westminster doctrines and propositions supported
WCF 3.6 — Of God's Eternal Decree
Portion identified in the source as supported by this proof text:
- Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only.
Editorial qualification: This establishes a confessional proof-text and reception connection. It does not by itself establish the original reading, and its English-version comparison must be checked against the Greek variation unit.
Bahnsen four-point examination
Arbitrariness
At John 10:26, the critical choice avoids arbitrariness only to the extent that it states public manuscript, transcriptional, and intrinsic grounds. Principal competing reading: The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.” Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. The critical form uses a neuter relative, producing a construction translated in two principal ways.
Inconsistency
The criteria used at John 10:26 must be applied to comparable readings as well. A principle such as age, difficulty, brevity, or coherence cannot be decisive here and quietly reversed elsewhere merely to escape a historical, grammatical, or theological difficulty.
Consequences
Exegetical or interpretive consequence: No single doctrinal proposition is directly changed; the principal consequence is exegetical, historical, or cumulative.
Preconditions of intelligibility
The argument presupposes stable authorship, meaningful language, objective logical norms, transmissible evidence, and a coherent account of how Scripture can be received and identified by the church. The analysis tests whether the method can make those conditions intelligible without reducing the text to an indefinitely revisable editorial construct.
This framework examines an argument and its conditions; it does not claim to read an editor's private motives.
6Argument for the received reading
External and historical evidence
Some versions still take the Father as greater than all despite the grammatical roughness; others read, “What my Father has given me is greater than all.” Manuscripts also vary the position and presence of possessives and the gender of “greater.”
Internal and transcriptional evidence
Omission is easy if a copyist regarded the words as redundant; addition is possible as an explicit cross-reference.
Reception and ecclesiastical use
The final reminder stands in the received text but is absent from the SBLGNT and NA28. The neuter form can yield a profound statement about the Father’s gift, but it is unusually compressed and has generated incompatible translations inside the critical tradition.
Providential-preservation analysis
Providential preservation is not used as a substitute for evidence at John 10:26. It supplies the confessional context in which manuscript transmission, broad reception, and the church's actual possession of Scripture are evaluated together.
Canonical coherence with the rest of Scripture
Canonical coherence remains an explicit test: a proposed reading must make grammatical and theological sense within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. No conflict is asserted merely because two editions differ; the claimed incoherence must be demonstrated at this passage.
Canonical-coherence verdict
The Authorized Version is retained where its representation of the TR forms a coherent reading within the immediate context and the rest of Scripture. Any competing form must demonstrate an equal or better canonical fit rather than merely invoke an edition or method label.
Response to the principal critical argument
Principal competing reading: The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.” Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending. The critical form uses a neuter relative, producing a construction translated in two principal ways.
Passage-specific evidence from consulted works
Core 0.6.3 supplied-source audit complete: 1 passage-specific note attached. Incidental citations and global-method sources are retained in the audit report rather than presented as local textual evidence.
A List of Omissions and Changes Found in the Critical Text to Verses Used as Proof Texts in the Westminster StandardsWestminster proof-text and translation comparison
Seth Stark — supplied PDF pp. 52–53
At John 10:26, it compares the NKJV/TR-oriented wording “But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep, as I said to you.”” with the ESV/critical-text wording “but you do not believe because you are not part of my flock.”” and associates the passage with WCF 3.6.
Editorial use: This establishes a confessional proof-text and reception connection. It does not by itself establish the original reading, and its English-version comparison must be checked against the Greek variation unit.
Conclusion
The neuter form can yield a profound statement about the Father’s gift, but it is unusually compressed and has generated incompatible translations inside the critical tradition. Difficulty may indicate originality; it may equally be the residue of an early copying disturbance. An editorial method should not canonize obscurity merely because it is harder.
Retaining both received elements gives the argument a clear personal progression. Christ has already characterized those who refuse his voice; the Father who entrusted the sheep surpasses every hostile power. Their safety rests neither in the strength of the sheep nor in an abstract greatness of the gift, but in the united keeping of Father and Son.
Logical entailment
The Authorized Version serves as the faithful English representation. The preservation claim applies immediately to the authentic Hebrew and Greek texts—not to an English translation as though it were the inspired source.
Canonical-status rule: Physical printing is not canonical inclusion. If an edition prints a passage in double brackets while judging it secondary or non-original, it disagrees with the received text concerning the identity and extent of inspired Scripture.
Status: Established
Immediate textual or doctrinal consequence
At John 10:26, the received text reads “Verse 26 includes “as I said unto you”; verse 29 reads, “My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all.” and its Authorized Version representation reads . The assessed critical reading is “The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.
Necessary reasoning chain
- At John 10:26, the received Hebrew/Greek form is “Verse 26 includes “as I said unto you”; verse 29 reads, “My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all.”; the Authorized Version represents it as . The assessed critical form is “The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”.
- The received and critical forms are not the same at this locus. Therefore, if the competing critical form is original, the received form is secondary rather than the authentic wording at this place. The immediate consequence is: At John 10:26, the received text reads “Verse 26 includes “as I said unto you”; verse 29 reads, “My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all.” and its Authorized Version representation reads . The assessed critical reading is “The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”. The immediate consequence is that the critical text no longer states the received wording at this locus. The immediate local effect is exegetical or interpretive; this argument does not claim that a distinct Christian doctrine disappears from the verse.
- If the received form at this place is secondary rather than original, then the authentic Hebrew/Greek text was not kept pure at this place in the received textual tradition; therefore the unqualified confessional preservation claim must be denied or redefined.
Ultimate preservation consequence
If the competing reading is original and the received reading is secondary, then God did not preserve and keep pure the authentic text at this place in the received textual tradition. The unqualified confessional claim that Scripture was kept pure in all ages must therefore be denied or redefined.
Sources
- Westminster Confession of Faith (1647)Chapter 1, section 8 — Governing confessional preservation claim
- F. H. A. Scrivener, The New Testament in the Original Greek according to the Text followed in the Authorized VersionReceived Greek reading
- German Bible Society — UBS6 publications and relation to NA29Current critical-edition, ECM, or editorial documentation
- A List of Omissions and Changes Found in the Critical Text to Verses Used as Proof Texts in the Westminster Standardssupplied PDF pp. 52–53 — Westminster proof-text and translation comparison
- German Bible Society — The Sixth Edition of the Greek New TestamentCurrent critical-edition, ECM, or editorial documentation
Read the full research essay and its sources
Passage: John 10:26, 29
Received reading: Verse 26 includes “as I said unto you”; verse 29 reads, “My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all.”
Principal competing reading: The critical text omits the reminder and presents a neuter relative construction that may mean “what my Father has given me is greater than all.”
Editorial status: Preliminary record accepted for staging; independent review remains pending.
Jesus explains unbelief with the shepherd image: “Ye believe not,
because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.” The final reminder
stands in the received text but is absent from the SBLGNT and NA28. It
may point back generally to the preceding discourse rather than to an
exact earlier sentence. Omission is easy if a copyist regarded the words
as redundant; addition is possible as an explicit cross-reference.
Verse 29 presents the more intricate problem. Scrivener has a
masculine relative: “My Father, who gave them to me, is greater than
all.” The critical form uses a neuter relative, producing a construction
translated in two principal ways. Some versions still take the Father as
greater than all despite the grammatical roughness; others read, “What
my Father has given me is greater than all.” Manuscripts also vary the
position and presence of possessives and the gender of “greater.”
The received syntax moves naturally from Christ’s hand to the
Father’s hand. No one can pluck the sheep from the Son; the Father who
gave them is greater than all; no one can pluck them from the Father. “I
and my Father are one” then grounds the coordinated security without
confusing the persons.
The neuter form can yield a profound statement about the Father’s
gift, but it is unusually compressed and has generated incompatible
translations inside the critical tradition. Difficulty may indicate
originality; it may equally be the residue of an early copying
disturbance. An editorial method should not canonize obscurity merely
because it is harder.
Retaining both received elements gives the argument a clear personal
progression. Christ has already characterized those who refuse his
voice; the Father who entrusted the sheep surpasses every hostile power.
Their safety rests neither in the strength of the sheep nor in an
abstract greatness of the gift, but in the united keeping of Father and
Son.
Sources and further reading
- John 6:37–40; 10:22–30; 17:6–12.
- Scrivener, John 10:26, 29.
- SBLGNT apparatus at John 10:26 and 10:29.
7Related materials
Open a group to follow connected articles, books, biographies, media, research notes, variants, or downloads. Research Center relationships use permanent record IDs; external items retain their actual link.
- Record
- VAR-2174
- Status
- Preliminary
- Version
- 1.1-dossier
- Review
- Level B — Editorial synthesis
- Editor
- Chris Thomas
- Reviewer
- Independent reviewer pending assignment
- First date
- 1st century · Date Range
- Last revised
- 2026-07-22
Evidence and editorial controls
- Verification
- Passage, principal readings, and stated editorial comparison checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the current SBLGNT text and apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.
- Rights and access
- Original editorial synthesis. Biblical readings are short scholarly quotations; cited editions and digital witnesses retain their stated rights and access conditions.
- Known limitations
- This staging record summarizes the principal variation unit and representative evidence. It is not a fresh collation of every extant manuscript, version, lectionary, or patristic citation.
Links from this record
No public outgoing links are recorded.
Records that cite or connect here
No public backlinks are recorded.
Corrections and evidence submissions
No correction submission is presently attached to this record. Submit evidence or read the correction policy.
Chris Thomas, “John 10:26, 29 — “Not of My Sheep” and the Father Greater than All,” VAR-2174, Confessional Bibliology Research Center, version 1.0-staging, last revised 2026-07-22.
Revision history
- — Chris Thomas