Home Pages Test

    Confessional Bibliology

    Where you'll find posts, audios, videos, books (pdfs/epubs), and other resources that will help you understand the Confessional View of Scripture as it was originally intended.

    Presuppositional Analysis of The King James Only Controversy by James R. White

    By |November 7th, 2024|Categories: Authorized Version, Book Review|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

    Presuppositional Analysis of The King James Only Controversy by James R. White Purpose and Scope of Analysis: This presuppositional analysis critically evaluates The King James Only Controversy by James R. White, focusing on the author’s

    Which Textus Receptus? A Response to Mark Ward’s Critique of Confessional Bibliology

    By |November 6th, 2024|Categories: Doctrine of Scripture|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , |

    Introduction The debate over the authenticity and authority of the Textus Receptus (TR) is not new, yet it remains a focal point of discussion within textual criticism and evangelical circles. Mark Ward’s Which Textus Receptus?

    Book Review: The King James Only Controversy by James R. White

    By |November 5th, 2024|Categories: Authority of Scripture, Biblical Authority, Book Review|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

    1. Introduction: Title: The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations? Author: James R. White Topic: An alleged critique of the King James Only (KJVO) movement, aimed at questioning the validity of limiting

    Debate Over the Preservation and Authority of Scripture. Part 5

    By |November 4th, 2024|Categories: Providential Preservation|Tags: , |

    8. Conclusion: Reaffirming Owen’s Legacy and the Doctrine of Preservation John Owen’s writings on the authority, inspiration, and preservation of Scripture provide a robust theological framework that stands in sharp contrast to Enlightenment-influenced approaches to