May 2020
The Arrogance of Scholars
One of the most common and socially acceptable sins in Christendom is the bearing of false witness. This sin usually takes the form of the logical fallacy known as the ad hominem. And while it is
Our Daily Metzger – Amos or Amon
In our previous post Asa or Asaph, we saw how Metzger had no qualms calling the Holy Ghost a liar when he stated, “the evangelist may have derived material for the genealogy, not from the Old Testament
Our Daily Metzger – Asa or Asaph
This is the first in a series that will cover some of the more outrageous and foolish claims by Dr. Bruce Metzger in his Textual Commentary. The series will also show that Restorationist Textual Criticism’s
Do we correct the Textus Receptus with new discoveries?
This objection to the Confessional View of Scripture keeps popping up along with the claim that we have no consistent methodology for textual criticism. Both of these are due to the assumption of RTC advocates that
Doctrinal Significance of John 1:18
HOW THE CRITICAL TEXT TEACHES THE GNOSTIC AND ARIAN HERESIES IN JOHN 1:18 AV/Textus Receptus/Byzantine Priority John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father,
The Verification Problem
IGNORING THE ISSUE With every textual claim put forth by advocates of RTC, whether Critical Text, Majority Text, or something else, they all suffer from the same flaw: an inability to verify their textual choices.