{
    "schema": "cbrc-public-record-export/1",
    "generated_at": "2026-10-13T04:42:28+00:00",
    "count": 1,
    "context": {
        "q": "",
        "type": "",
        "status": "",
        "certainty": "",
        "language": "",
        "topic": "",
        "book": "matthew",
        "century": "",
        "passage": "Matthew 1:10",
        "review": "",
        "verification": "",
        "related_to": "",
        "sort": "updated_desc",
        "page": 1,
        "per_page": 24
    },
    "items": [
        {
            "record_id": "VAR-1002",
            "post_type": "cb_variant",
            "record_type": "Variant",
            "title": "Matthew 1:10 — Amon or Amos? A Second Genealogical Name under Review",
            "slug": "matthew-1-10-amon-or-amos-a-second-genealogical-name-under-review",
            "excerpt": "Matthew’s next disputed name repeats the shape of the first.",
            "url": "https://confessionalbibliology.com/research/variants/matthew-1-10-amon-or-amos-a-second-genealogical-name-under-review/",
            "status": "Preliminary",
            "certainty": "",
            "verification_level": "Recovered project data; bibliographic and source-level verification remains record-specific. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation.",
            "review_level": "Level B — Editorial synthesis",
            "last_revised": "2026-07-22",
            "modified_gmt": "2026-07-23T00:53:31+00:00"
        }
    ]
}