{
    "schema": "cbrc-public-record-export/1",
    "generated_at": "2026-10-17T06:26:21+00:00",
    "count": 4,
    "context": {
        "q": "",
        "type": "",
        "status": "",
        "certainty": "",
        "language": "",
        "topic": "",
        "book": "luke",
        "century": "",
        "passage": "Luke 22:44",
        "review": "",
        "verification": "",
        "related_to": "",
        "sort": "updated_desc",
        "page": 1,
        "per_page": 24
    },
    "items": [
        {
            "record_id": "VAR-2114",
            "post_type": "cb_variant",
            "record_type": "Variant",
            "title": "Luke 22:43–44 I — The Manuscript Evidence for the Angel and the Bloody Sweat",
            "slug": "luke-22-43-44-the-manuscript-evidence-for-the-angel-and-the-bloody-sweat",
            "excerpt": "The received text includes the strengthening angel, Christ’s agony, and sweat like drops of blood. The passage is absent from several major early witnesses, present in many others including an early fragment, marked in some copies, and transposed in a small stream.",
            "url": "https://confessionalbibliology.com/research/variants/luke-22-43-44-the-manuscript-evidence-for-the-angel-and-the-bloody-sweat/",
            "status": "Preliminary",
            "certainty": "",
            "verification_level": "Passage, principal readings, and stated editorial comparison checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the SBLGNT text and apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.",
            "review_level": "Level B — Editorial synthesis",
            "last_revised": "2026-07-22",
            "modified_gmt": "2026-07-23T00:54:25+00:00"
        },
        {
            "record_id": "VAR-2115",
            "post_type": "cb_variant",
            "record_type": "Variant",
            "title": "Luke 22:43–44 II — Justin, Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and the Early Patristic Witness",
            "slug": "luke-22-43-44-justin-irenaeus-hippolytus-and-the-early-patristic-witness",
            "excerpt": "Second- and early-third-century Christian writers know the bloody-sweat tradition and use it in arguments about Christ’s incarnation and passion. Their testimony predates the great fourth-century codices but must still be evaluated as citation, not as surviving Gospel manuscripts.",
            "url": "https://confessionalbibliology.com/research/variants/luke-22-43-44-justin-irenaeus-hippolytus-and-the-early-patristic-witness/",
            "status": "Preliminary",
            "certainty": "",
            "verification_level": "Passage, principal readings, and stated editorial comparison checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the SBLGNT text and apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.",
            "review_level": "Level B — Editorial synthesis",
            "last_revised": "2026-07-22",
            "modified_gmt": "2026-07-23T00:54:25+00:00"
        },
        {
            "record_id": "VAR-2116",
            "post_type": "cb_variant",
            "record_type": "Variant",
            "title": "Luke 22:43–44 III — Christ’s True Humanity and the Theological Pressure upon the Text",
            "slug": "luke-22-43-44-christs-true-humanity-and-the-theological-pressure-upon-the-text",
            "excerpt": "The passage became a christological battleground because it depicts angelic strengthening and intense bodily anguish. Both interpolation and omission have been explained as doctrinally motivated, so theology must illuminate possible transmission without dictating the text.",
            "url": "https://confessionalbibliology.com/research/variants/luke-22-43-44-christs-true-humanity-and-the-theological-pressure-upon-the-text/",
            "status": "Preliminary",
            "certainty": "",
            "verification_level": "Passage, principal readings, and stated editorial comparison checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the SBLGNT text and apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.",
            "review_level": "Level B — Editorial synthesis",
            "last_revised": "2026-07-22",
            "modified_gmt": "2026-07-23T00:54:25+00:00"
        },
        {
            "record_id": "VAR-2117",
            "post_type": "cb_variant",
            "record_type": "Variant",
            "title": "Luke 22:43–44 IV — Omission, Transposition, and the Probable History of Corruption",
            "slug": "luke-22-43-44-omission-transposition-and-the-probable-history-of-corruption",
            "excerpt": "The pattern of omission, critical marking, and relocation suggests an early disputed passage. The received position in Luke best explains the material’s language and reception, while its movement into Matthew reflects attempts to preserve words whose location had been questioned.",
            "url": "https://confessionalbibliology.com/research/variants/luke-22-43-44-omission-transposition-and-the-probable-history-of-corruption/",
            "status": "Preliminary",
            "certainty": "",
            "verification_level": "Passage, principal readings, and stated editorial comparison checked against Scrivener’s received Greek text and the SBLGNT text and apparatus; exhaustive manuscript collation remains open. Metzger commentary entries were matched by exact passage where present; ECM/CBGM rationale is passage-specific only when an official editorial explanation is cited. Ledger rows are identified as UBS6 / intended NA29 data but retain their row-level verification caveats pending direct collation. Supplied-source audit completed in Core 0.6.3. Accepted local notes were matched by canonical passage and manually bounded; source claims remain attributed where current apparatus verification is pending.",
            "review_level": "Level B — Editorial synthesis",
            "last_revised": "2026-07-22",
            "modified_gmt": "2026-07-23T00:54:25+00:00"
        }
    ]
}